To be considered for honors, you must plan to take all 10 of your required courses for a grade, and receive a B in no more than one. If you take one of the 10 courses pass/fail then that will be counted as a B for honors purposes.
Students must complete the methods requirement prior to applying to the Honors program, i.e. by the end of the sixth semester.
Interested students should start reaching out to potential advisors in February of their junior year.
In their senior year students register for POLS1910 (Fall) and POLS1920 (Spring) which together count as one credit. These two courses combined fulfill the senior capstone requirement.
Honors Application Deadline: April 9th by 5:00pm. Only applications submitted by the deadline will be considered.
All applications are to be submitted electronically to suzanne_brough@brown.edu.
Submit the application by the deadline. Completed applications include:
- The application form.
- A copy of your most recent transcript, and, if applicable, a copy of your study abroad transcript.
- One writing sample from a political science course taken at Brown; the writing sample should demonstrate your ability to undertake independent research.
- The project proposal. This should be a 1-2 page typed (and polished) description of the honors thesis project you wish to pursue. In preparing the proposal, you must answer the following questions.
- What is the basic question or research area?
- Why is this an important topic?
- What relationship does this project have to your course background in political science at Brown University?
- Email agreement from your advisor who must be a faculty member in the political science department.
- Email agreement from your second reader. Both emails should be forwarded to Suzanne_Brough@brown.edu. Applications without agreements from both an advisor and a reader will be automatically declined.
The Undergraduate Committee, led by the Director of Undergraduate Studies, will review applications. Decisions will be made soon after the deadline. Staff will notify students and their advisors of application decisions.
Students approved for the honors program should register for POLS1910 (fall) and POLS1920 (Spring). Both courses require overrides. The POLS 1910/20 seminar helps students make their way through the steps of writing a successful thesis. Students learn research skills, how to ask good answerable questions, how to develop a method for answering those questions, how to research and write a literature review. They also support each other in the writing process through peer review activities.
Deadlines (exact deadlines are adjusted each year):
Mid-November – Chapter 1 due
Exam period – Chapter 2 due
Late January – Chapter 3 due
Late March – Completed drafts are due to both readers
Early April – Readers give revisions to students
Mid-April – Final thesis is due to both readers
Late April/Early May – Honors Presentations. Each student has 10-12 minutes to present their thesis with slides. Q&A afterwards.
Students are required to submit their thesis to the Brown Digital Repository and send confirmation they have done so.
Starting in academic year 2026-27, concentration course grades will be confirmed prior to awarding honors. Students can receive no more than one ‘B’ grade in the 10 required courses for the political science concentration.
Political Science Undergraduate Honors Theses | ||
Year | Title | Student |
2024 | The Digital Divide: Chronicling the Changing Editorial Practices of American Newsrooms in the Age of Online Media | Laura David |
Weaving Histories: Unraveling the Diverging Textile Political Economies of India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam Through Colonization and Globalization | Phoebe Dragseth | |
Toward a More-Than-Human Politics of Non-Domination | Zoe Magley | |
The Bottom Line: The Role of Profit Motivations in Modern Media Organizations | Caroline Parente | |
Colonial Legacies Today: Understanding Public Opinion of Japan in South Korea and Taiwan | Elaine Wang | |
The Political Dynamics Behind Medicaid Unwinding: Explaining State Variability in Enrollment Outcomes and Policy Choices | Jonathan Zhang | |
2023 | Political Justification amid Reasonable Disagreement | Ryan Frant |
‘Polite Anarchy’: An Analysis of the Institutional and Leadership Forces behind Judicial Confirmation Delay in the Senate, 1980 to Present | Matthew Lichtblau | |
Staff Connections in Congress: A Quantitative Analysis into the Influence of Congressional Staff on Partisan Polarization | An Chit (Jasper) Long | |
Fair Food vs. Free Farming: Explaining Low Unionization Rates Among U.S. Farm Employees | Maisie Newbury | |
Latino COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake Amid the First Year of Vaccine Availability in the United States | Christopher Pool | |
Opportunity Migrants and Border Restrictions: A Conversation on Personal Autonomy and Self-Determination | Fausto Rojas | |
Preferences Shape Positives: Evaluating Women’s Labor Market Outcomes in the US and Sweden Through the Lens of a Contextualized Comparison | Samantha Schaab-Rozbicki | |
The Role of Decentralization and Bureaucratic Quality in Absorbing EU Structural Funds: Evidence from Bulgaria and Romania | Matthew Walsh | |
2022 | The Atomistic Approach: A New Way to Begin Constitutional Interpretation | Elias Kaul |
The Politics of Privatisation in India | Lavanya Krishnan | |
Implicit Federalism: The Waxman-Markey Bill’s Impact on State Policy | William Berlin | |
Destiny, Policy, or Rent-Seeking? Unravelling the Causes of Hong Kong’s Public Housing Crisis | Hing Lai Sophia Chan | |
Constitutionalizing Ethnic Identity in Modern Democracy: The Case of the Israeli Nation-State Law | Zachary Harris | |
More Harm than Good? State Responses to Drugs and Their Impact on Drug-Induced Death Rates in Europe | Emily Pluhar |